Two capabilities
Prism has three goals on the user side: ship more finished work, use tokens well, and get better at prompting. The product groups its capabilities into two halves that serve those goals — under one headline number, the Prompt Score (average prompt grade, 0–100), with a supporting Completion rate beneath it.
| Goal | Metric | What moves it |
|---|---|---|
| Get better at prompting | Prompt Score (APG) — headline | Prompt Advisor (coaching) + Usage Intelligence (habit tracking) |
| Ship more finished work | Completion rate · Speed (CSPW) | Prompt Advisor (better prompts land their goal) |
| Use tokens well | Token Usage (Crush Weight, TPT) | Usage Intelligence (cost visibility) + Prompt Advisor (shorter paths) |
See Prompt Score for the headline score and Algorithm Overview for how a sub-session gets graded as crushed.
Prompt Advisor
Section titled “Prompt Advisor”Audience: individual users.
Helps you write better prompts and improve your AI-collaboration habits — live on the dashboard and after the fact. The coaching lives in the dashboard, not the terminal; the plugin’s job is to capture telemetry and prompt text.
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Realtime view | The dashboard realtime view streams each prompt as you send it, scored turn-by-turn, with a per-sub-session Task Advisor (weakest rubric check plus an example rewrite) — see Realtime |
| Live session snapshot | /prism:realtime prints the current session’s live grade, cost, and turn count in the terminal |
| Session advisor cards | LLM-authored coaching cards per sub-session, tied to the weakest prompt habit — see Advisor & Summaries |
| Session title & summary | LLM-generated title and 1–2 sentence recap on every session, editable from the dashboard |
| Skill profile | Skill Index with per-pillar trends — see Skill |
| Report | Chapter-based personal review with strengths, weaknesses, worst prompts, and heatmaps — see Report |
Usage Intelligence
Section titled “Usage Intelligence”Audience: users first; team leads for aggregate views.
Turns raw telemetry into outcome, cost, and habit signals you can act on.
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Prompt Score | Headline score — Average Prompt Grade (APG) over time — see Prompt Score |
| Completion rate | Crushed-sub-session rate over time (supporting outcome metric) |
| Speed | Crushed sub-sessions per window with TTC (Time To Crush) — see Speed |
| Token Usage | Crush Weight, TET, TPT, and token mix — see Token Usage |
| Prompt Grade | Per-prompt grading with a per-session breakdown — see Prompt Grade |
| Trivia | Sub-sessions filtered out by the substance floor — see Trivia |
| Integrity | Anti-gaming flags raised against your sessions — see Integrity |
| Sub-session explorer | Browse and drill into any closed sub-session, turn-by-turn |
How the two work together
Section titled “How the two work together”User writes prompt → Telemetry + prompt text captured (Ingest → API) → Session closes on /clear or topic shift → API grades the prompt and the outcome judge marks it crushed / not crushed → Usage Intelligence updates Prompt Score, Completion rate, Speed, Token Usage → Prompt Advisor surfaces coaching on the dashboard (realtime Task Advisor, advisor cards, Report) → User improves → cycle repeatsBetter prompts (Advisor) raise your Prompt Score and make sub-sessions more likely to land their goal, which raises the Completion rate and pulls Crush Weight down (fewer tokens per finished sub-session). The two aren’t separate products — they’re two views of the same loop.